News

01

12 Labour Inspectorate Rulings — First Takeaways for Employers

Poland's National Labour Inspectorate has issued 12 rulings under its new powers — 8 of them reclassifying the arrangement as an employment relationship. Here's what employers should watch for.

Poland’s National Labour Inspectorate (PIP) has already issued 12 interpretations based on its new powers. In each case, it assesses the relationship between the parties as a whole – the form of the contract, its name, or the parties’ declared intent are not decisive. What matters is how the cooperation actually functions in practice.

At the same time, it is increasingly clear that the elements set out directly in the Labour Code carry particular weight, including:

  • broadly understood managerial supervision,
  • the personal nature of the work performed,
  • a defined place and time of performing duties.

Supervision and subordination take centre stage

In its rulings, PIP examines in detail who organises the work, assigns day-to-day tasks, decides how they are to be carried out, and whether the contractor retains genuine autonomy.

The real – rather than merely contractual – possibility of substitution is also significant. This is closely linked to the assessment of whether a person is obliged to perform the work personally.

PIP also takes into account the place and time of performing duties, the nature of the tasks carried out, the method of remuneration, and who bears the business risk. All of these factors feed into the overall assessment of the relationship, but the focus is increasingly shifting toward the fundamental criteria characteristic of an employment relationship.

A direction is emerging, but no settled line yet

Of the 12 rulings issued so far, as many as 8 concluded that the model in question constituted an employment relationship. That is still too few to speak of a settled interpretative line, but the direction PIP is heading in is becoming clearer. The outcome of any given case remains difficult to predict, as similar circumstances are not always assessed the same way.

We’re keeping a close eye on this and analysing further rulings. If you’d like to check which elements of your cooperation model may be decisive from PIP’s perspective, feel free to reach out to Marta Chacińska, Marta Dominiak-Sporna, or Mateusz Lasak.

Contact

02

Headquarter
in Warsaw:

ul. Moniuszki 1A
00-014 Warszawa
+48 (22) 629 09 17
biuro@thedy.pl

Designate a route

Branch office
in Katowice:

ul. Dworcowa 4 (Old Railway Station)
40-012 Katowice
+48 508 018 322
biuro@thedy.pl

Designate a route

Branch office
in Poznań:

ul. Królowej Jadwigi 43 (Business Link Maraton)
61-871 Poznań
+48 537 555 135
biuro@thedy.pl

Designate a route

Branch office
in Wrocław:

ul. Szczytnicka 11 (Green2Day)
50-382 Wrocław
+48 606 443 050
biuro@thedy.pl

Designate a route

Thedy & Partners sp. z o.o.
Tax advisory services
KRS: 570600
NIP: 113-289-37-45
REGON: 362235613
Capital: 150.000 PLN

T&P ADVISORY Sp. z o.o.
Stanisława Moniuszki 1A
00-014 Warszawa, Polska
NIP 5253065920

T&P Finance sp. z o.o.
KRS: 957685
NIP: 522-322-04-16
REGON: 521400905
Capital: 6.000 PLN
 

T&P ACCOUNTING P.S.A.
Stanisława Moniuszki 1A,
00-014 Warszawa
NIP: 5253101248